Sales Essentials Blog

Why you shouldn’t respond to every RFP and tender

Posted by:

Do you have clear criteria to assess the relevance and risk of every tender or RFP (request for proposal) that comes into your business?

Do you know how much it will cost you in terms of your time, effort, people resources and money to respond to a tender or RFP?

Do you know what the probability of you winning a tender or RFP is?

If you cannot answer these questions with hard facts and information you are likely to be putting your business at risk when it comes to responding to tenders and RFPs. And that’s even before you have won the deal.

Here are some things to consider before your leap into the RFP and Tender world.

Selling is all about assessing, managing and winning the right sales opportunities while managing COSA (cost of sale activity).  

COSA is the direct cost-to-company of a salesperson plus the proportional cost of Support Functions for salespeople, divided equally across the sales team. To calculate COSA one has to include salary packages for salespeople including cars, phones, insurance, etc., proportional share of support / infrastructural cost contribution and so on

Every sales opportunity, won or lost, costs. 

How much is selling via tenders and RFPs costing you?

Responding to tenders and RFPs can be a black hole when it comes to sucking out resources from your business. Done well it can be very rewarding, done badly it can cripple a business. 

less is moreNot all tenders and RFPs are created equal

Someone asked the question on LinkedIn the other day whether or not people respond to blind tenders.  At Barrett we do not respond to blind tenders or RFPs at all.  You have no idea what you are dealing with. It’s up to you what you do but we deem these too risky and a poor use of time. Like shooting in the dark or taking a shotgun approach to selling in the hope if you fire enough you will hit something, blind tenders or closed tenders are not recommended.

Even with companies who you have some familiarity with tenders, if you do not have key contacts in that business already, cannot do a proper needs analysis of the opportunity it is not worth it. The probability of you winning the deal is likely to be less than 40%. Why bother?

Unless you have a deeper knowledge of the business, access to key stakeholders, some form or reputation or branding visibility in there or your offer is a direct match to what is being asked for, then you may need to rethink the tender opportunity.

For instance, late in 2017 we were approached by a major business here in Australia to look at a very large sales training opportunity. The good news is the sourcing team found us on the internet and did some background checking on us beforehand. Tick, our marketing and branding is working.

Of course, initially we were pretty excited.

However, once we got into the detail a picture emerged that told us a different story.

We are very big on risk assessment at Barrett. Not all deals are good deals. We did our due diligence on this opportunity. Here is what we discovered using our 3 tiered risk management approach:

1) The overall procurement process – is it fair to both parties?

No, this contract was not fair to suppliers. Many RFP, tender and procurement processes are one-sided to the client and often put the suppliers at great risk. This was the case here. We decided we couldn’t fight the beast or change their minds.  

2) Is the actual brief logical, well thought out and workable?

  1. This brief was flawed and poorly designed. It was not going to work without a major redesign

3) Is the brief legitimate? Are they fishing for expertise/ideas and want to do it themselves?

My instincts told me that they were fishing. Looking to take suppliers ideas and do it themselves. This happens quite a lot which is why we have reduced significantly the amount of information we put in proposals, especially in the early stages. Do not give away too much.

We also have an ideal client profile checklist that we like to use especially in cases such as these. If the client’s behaviours are unethical, untoward or don’t align with our values we are unlikely to work with them.

In the case of this prospect, we did go back to them seeking answers to our legitimate questions for 1 and 2 and there was no movement from their side. So we withdrew which shocked the client. They even asked us to stay but we said NO.

Some time-saving tender tips:

  • Have commonly asked for company information in one location up-to-date and ready to go
    • Including company information -structure, subsidiaries, values, ABN #, etc.-; insurances -public, professional, etc.-; policies such as OH&S, quality standards, environment, sustainability, anti-slavery, etc.; achievements, memberships, etc.
  • Product/Services information
    • Set up in a systematic way making it clear, easy to read and understood. Short succinct messaging that is customer face
    • Technical information: makes sure diagrams, models and so on are well designed, in picture format.

Remember everybody lives by selling something.

Author: Sue Barrett, 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

To prove you are human, enter the AntiSpam Text shown in the image into the input field
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word
Fill in text as seen in the image *